We were devastated. The kid we
had planned and speculated over for such a long time was
suddenly not the one we had. Neither of us has ever been into
fatalism, the futile politics of blame, but it hit hard.
The mysterious acceptance of "gods will" - the
faith that sustains some people - wasn't relevant to us. It was too big to swallow, yet too insistent to deny. A
collapsing, festering sense of grief which, for me, turned
into rage. I was reminded of an image in Bergman's film The
Virgin Spring where the father, responding to the defilement
of his daughter by a couple of bodgies, blindly took revenge
on God by ripping a young sapling from the ground. I felt
just as helpless - a sickening realisation that none of our
assets or capabilities...the best endeavours of our
imaginations...the combined willpower of our desires or
anything else at our disposal could change the reality.
I am reasonably practical when it comes to making and
mending things. The bigger the problem the greater the
challenge and, when prolonged concentration and strategies
are successfully brought to bear, a suitably rewarding
dividend. But this was something I couldn't fix. Helplessness
seethed for months.
The practicalities were manageable and Helen took charge
of the necessities while I foundered in an ulcerating
confusion...wandering the streets late at night hoping for
something but knowing you don't find many miracles in the
gutter. Just more of the numb, impotent knot of nothing. The
questions going around and around unanswered. You cut off its
head and it grows another.
There was a time I entertained the hope that the kid would
die and save herself (and us), a life of distress. ..I was
virtually out of control, consumed by futility. That's how
selfish and blind-alleyed my thinking became...even while our
friends and families rallied strongly and offered as much
buoyancy as
you could hope for.
Looking back on the moment of truth and its repercussions
- which I do from time to time - (every day), it seems a long
while ago and a long way away. Which it is. Time flies like
an arrow...fruit flies like a banana. You can't live like that because its not living but rather a
kind of death.
That season of darkness was almost ten years ago. Now, everything is a plus. She walks, she talks, she laughs
and tells jokes and is so buoyant with life that if the
people who wrote in those medical encyclopaedias could see
her, they'd reach for the petrol and matches to ensure no-one
else was wounded unnecessarily by the abject negativity of
their prognosis.
Yesterday she brought home a commendation from school
which cited her as a cheerful, well-behaved pupil and
everybody's friend. My heart sang. She has a life - a real,
valid, sustaining life.
This is no miracle cure of Cri du Chat but there is a
process that enables parents to accept, to adapt and draw
sustenance from a damaged child. It might be called
healing...I don't know.
Is she just managing to give a good impression of being a
"normal" kid? Copying, emulating, responding to
peer group pressure for an acceptable approximation? No, it
reaches well beyond that. Hanne was never any less than
normal, in her own terms anyway...in that she was and is,
always herself - unique... original - taking from the world
and putting back.
Those who don't know or can't understand are the ones
unable to see just how normal she is. A bit slow? Sure...so
what? It all goes in and it will all come out when you least
expect it.
Reduced in ability? I suppose so. Defining these things
can only be done with a mixture of realism and acceptance
rather than straight comparison or envy. But its never been a
matter of comparison even though we are obliged to measure
everything she does against "norms" and graphs and
statistical averages.
I prefer her the way she is...different. Not that I'd
hesitate for a second if some Faustian deal magically arose
offering her a better shot at life in the 21st century.
All those people in jeans commercials, bourbon and
basketball shoe ads, pushing themselves to the limit to be
"individual" while slavishly conforming to the
product role model. They aren't different...they're
predictable. Be different - buy the right products.
Every "spontaneous" act of buying flowers for
the spunky girl flouncing down the street in some
choreographed daydream by some advertising agency poppy whose
every half original thought is for sale. Conditioned
responses to predetermined scenarios.
Hanne is a good kid, who tries her best most of the time
and whose take on life is enthusiastic. She goes to a regular
school where she is treated decently by all her peers and
almost never cops abuse. Why should she? The kids around her
are good kids who are used to sharing space and who have
grown up with the same constants. They're great for her (and
mostly to) her….. and its reciprocal.
The frustrations that inevitably result from her
ineptitude or from taking soft options are, I expect, not
much different from those facing other parents. Our friends
with youngsters certainly don't live in some picture postcard
perfection denied to us. Happy Family commercials are okay if
you aspire to a spray-on-wipe-off life.
Life is more a matter of taking the rough with the smooth
than buying the correct products and we just happen to have
had a rather large dose of rough.
I can think of far worse situations...such as the agony of
dealing with a sick child who might not get better. Or of
coming to terms with the death of a youngster who is perfect
in every way but whose life is lost in an accident of some
sort.
It happens every day...expectations and the best of plans
snatched away in an instant. Its impossible to imagine anyone
really living the sort of lives presented as desirable by the
demented advertising execs who do their level worst to excite
us about the virtues of creamier margarine and softer toilet
"tissyew". You make your own luck and you don't
throw in your hand because you don't fancy the cards that
you've been dealt. There's not much mileage in blaming fate
or finding reasons to avoid the consequences of Nature. Even
less in consoling yourself for misfortune.
There's the expectations of others - your child primarily
- that demand you get on with living your life as it comes to
you...a day at a time. After all, it's easier to appreciate
and understand life in small chunks rather than lifetimes.
A good day can be sorted through and appreciated just as
easily as a bad one can be written off and consigned to the
past so the next arrives fresh and ready for whatever you can
put into it and get out of it.
The past is this moment escaping into a rubbish tip of
wasted time or a bonfire of good intentions gone bad through
neglect. Now is much more important than yesterday...even if
yesterday was good.
Doug Anderson is a writer
for the Sydney Morning Herald and the father of Hanne aged 9.
Copyright © 1999
Doug Anderson
TOP
Hanne recently went
on a world trip with her family. Click on the photo to see an extract
from Hanne's Travel Journal
TOP